The Work of Deacons

Local ChurchIntroduction

Paul directed his letter to the church at Philippi specifically “to all the saints in Christ Jesus who are in Philippi, with the bishops and deacons.” From its contextual proximity to the office of bishop, the reader can ascertain that Paul is addressing a group of people serving in the office of deacon. They are not merely servants as all Christians are commanded to be, but fill that special office of deacon assigned by the Holy Spirit to qualified men thus appointed. It is our aim to discern what is the work of the deacons within the church of Jesus Christ. Because the mission of the office is somewhat obscure, various denominations have evidently mutated the office and actually elevated it above that of bishop. It would be a mistake to consider the modern deacon tradition among artificial religions to be indicative of the Bible mandate for the office. Instead, we search the scriptures and find three distinct lines of reasoning to guide our quest:

  1. The implication of the Greek word diakonos which is translated “deacon” in various passages.
  2. The qualifications given for the office by the Holy Spirit in 1 Timothy 3.
  3. The likelihood that the apostles’ selection of seven men to assist their work in Acts 6 constitutes a prototypical deaconship.

DiakonosOur English word “deacon” is derived from the Greek diakonos, defined by Thayer as “one who executes the commands of another, esp. Of a master; a servant, attendant, minister.” The Greek word diakonos can have a common or official usage, dependent upon the context. Both usages, however, are closely related, and distinguished by whether one’s service is done in an official capacity as appointed by the bishops of a local congregation. It is translated into the common word “servant” 25 times in the New Testament, being rendered the official word “deacon” on only five appearances.English translators have generally rendered the common usage of diakonos by the word “servant” instead of “deacon,” so as to make clear that only those properly qualified and appointed are deacons in the official sense of the word. The word is commonly used of the king’s servants in Matthew 23:13 and of a servant of the church in Colossians 1:25. Just as one can be an elder in a common sense – any older person – or in the official sense – a duly qualified and appointed church officer, so may one be a deacon in the common sense – any person engaged in the service of another – or the official sense – a duly qualified and appointed church officer.

Just as the reader may discern the basic nature of the work of elders from the very word itself, so he may learn of the general nature of the deacon’s work through understanding the meaning of diakonos. The concept of oversight is built into the Greek word episkopos, translated bishop or elder. Inherent in diakonos is the concept of service.

The relationship of these properly defined terms and the offices themselves teaches plainly that the elders serve in a higher capacity than the deacons. The bishops have the oversight of the flock among them, including its work. The deacons serve to carry out that program of work at the direction of the bishops.

Modern religious organizations in which a Board of Deacons oversees the church’s work and treasury, including its often singular “bishop” or pastor, are perverting God’s organization of the local congregation. Instead the presbytery, or eldership, should take the lead and direct the deacons in their work.

The Qualifications For the Office Given in 1 Timothy 3Paul follows the qualification of bishops with those of deacons in 1 Timothy 3:8-13. This process of qualifying and selecting certain members of the church to serve an appointment as deacons marks the clear distinction again between general servants and those holding the office of deacon.The qualifications are similar to those of elders, but recognized as slightly less strict. This is due to the fact that deacons may be younger and less experienced than their counterparts in the presbytery.

Verse eight of this passage demands that candidates for deacon be trustworthy with money, not like Judas Iscariot, who robbed his own Lord. In carrying out the elders’ instructions, they must be above suspicion.

Likewise, verse 10 demands that candidates first be tested or proven and then appointed only if they are found blameless. The members of the church they will serve must examine them and determine that they are fit to become deacons. Accusations against them should be investigated and resolved immediately, both in the interest of their soul’s salvation and that of their appointment to this office. If the candidate is proven blameless – that is, no evil report against them is upheld – then they are qualified to serve, provided they meet the other requirements.

For one, the office of deacon can only be filled by a man. In this modern age of feminism and gender equity, many wonder if this requirement should be enforced. If it is not, then no other passage of scripture is safe from reinterpretation either. When God demands that every elder be the husband of one wife, it necessarily eliminates the possibility of a woman serving in the office of deacon. Some may infer from the King James Version that Phoebe of Cenchrea served in the office of deacon. Although the word diakonon is attached honorably to her record, only the common usage of the word can be harmonized with the requirement that official deacons be the husbands of one wife. While we assign the common usage of diakonon to Phoebe, we pause to note that her service was quite extraordinary, so that the Holy Spirit recorded her name for all time upon the pages of the New Testament. She is the mother of all godly women who serve their brethren with diligence and love in a number of ways.

It is also obvious from this passage that the office of deacon is one of great labor. It must never be conferred as an honorary title to a man with no ability or intention of carrying out the duty the office implies. “For those who have served well as deacons obtain for themselves a good standing and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus” (verse 13).

Prototypical Deacons of Acts 6The need for deacons in the church arose very quickly in the city of Jerusalem. Despite the presence of living apostles, the church became troubled and nearly divided over a physical concern that threatened to distract the spiritual nature of these leaders’ work and doctrine.“Now in those days, when the number of the disciples was multiplying, there arose a complaint against the Hebrews by the Hellenists, because their widows were neglected in the daily distribution” (Acts 6:1). We learn that the membership of the Jerusalem church was extremely large and consisted of many widows that required daily attention. Perhaps they were such as could be called widows indeed and added to a list of continuous benevolence. In any event, it appears that some of these believing widows were finding their physical need for assistance being neglected.

“Then the twelve summoned the multitude of the disciples and said, ‘It is not desirable that we should leave the word of God and serve tables'” (Acts 6:2). The apostles recognized that their work was primarily to teach the word of God as the Holy Spirit was revealing it to them, according to Christ’s prophecy. To put the Spirit on hold in order to serve and clear tables was unthinkable, especially when there were so many other saints who could easily minister to the needy widows. The service of these tables and widows is expressed with the word diakonos. Whomever would take this responsibility would be a servant of the Jerusalem church in some capacity.

“Therefore, brethren, seek out from among you seven men of good reputation, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom, whom we may appoint over this business; but we will give ourselves continually to prayer and the ministry of the word” (Acts 6:3-4). Thus the apostles required that those selected to serve be men and also proven by the Jerusalem church to be worthy of the work. They would serve with the consent and appointment of the apostles by relieving them of physical tasks in favor of spiritual ones. Seven men were likely chosen because this was the ideal number to do the work efficiently. Two of the greatest saints of the New Testament were chosen: Stephen the first martyr and Philip the compassionate evangelist.

Were these seven men deacons in the official sense of the word, as seen in 1 Timothy 3? It would be impossible to prove, but it can safely be inferred that their work and appointment were prototypical of the office of deacon, in that they were set apart from other servants of the church.

Duties of DeaconsThe duties of the deacons, then, are determined by the elders who oversee the congregation and direct its program of evangelism, edification and benevolence. Their work will be primarily to see to the physical needs of the church, especially of the needy. Although deacons may also preach God’s word, such is not necessary to fulfilling their office.A deacon’s place is in submission to the eldership, like any other member of a local church (Heb. 13:17). They are not to take the oversight of the church upon themselves or to institute any effort without the consent of their overseers. They will regularly meet with the elders in the process of their service together, and may often make suggestions as to what is needed and how various initiatives might best be accomplished, but they will never step out of their role as servants to become shepherds (1 Peter 5:2).

Without the understanding that the work of the seven men in Acts 6 is typical, or at least prototypical, of the work of deacons, the scriptures would provide very little instruction on their work. Clearly they were servants, proven by the church and appointed according to the will of God. We can glean from this that the deacons are responsible for ministering to the physical needs of the church so that her bishops and teachers might remain focused upon the spiritual ministry of the word. As Acts 6 makes plain, physical concerns can cripple a church and taint its sense of family; the deacons’ work is to ensure that no one is neglected or left to suffer in need.

Perhaps the following tasks could reasonably be assigned to deacons:

  1. Special attention should be given to the church’s widows, so that they are shown respect and not neglected. Some widows will need help in their homes, with meals, with the upkeep of their yards and houses, with the administration of their finances, with trips to the grocery store, pharmacy, doctor and elsewhere. While pure and undefiled religion demands that all saints visit such widows, the elders should see to it that deacons ensure all widows are equally served.
  2. Special attention should also be given to any that might be orphaned in the church. A deacon might be especially helpful if a young person has lost his or her father. The deacon might ensure that this loss is softened by promises to stand in whenever necessary.
  3. Deacons can serve the elders and the church by taking care of the church’s physical property as well. They can see to it that the meeting house is in good repair and always prepared for assemblies. Likewise, they can take care of the grounds, that the yard might always reflect a diligent and vigilant group of people and that no state of disrepair be allowed to give occasion for infidels to ridicule the church.
  4. Since deacons are to be free of greed, they should be trusted to handle the treasury of the church. They may count the weekly contribution and see to the deposit of the funds. The elders will determine how the money is spent, in the Lord, but the deacons may do much of the actual purchasing of supplies for the church’s use in teaching and maintenance.
  5. Deacons may take care to maintain the tract rack found in many meeting houses. While the elders determine which tracts are there, the deacons may arrange their purchase and ensure that the rack is neat and filled.

ConclusionNo doubt the reader can think of many other duties that belong to deacons. So long as they fit the qualifications of the office and the nature of serving Christ’s church, they should prove scripturally sound. Let deacons resist the temptation to take more upon them than is right or to operate outside the oversight of the bishops. Then they will truly obtain a good standing in the kingdom.

Author: Smith, Jeff

Jeff S. Smith is an evangelist with the Woodmont church of Christ in Fort Worth, Texas. Jeff has been preaching the gospel since 1991 and has a Master of Arts Degree in counseling. In addition to his stateside ministry, Jeff has labored in Canada, Eastern Europe and India. He operates the ElectronicGospel website. Jeff was born in 1969 and raised in Paden City, West Virginia, where he graduated from PCHS in 1987. He was baptized into Christ on January 14, 1988 by Harry Rice and began preaching later that year in the hills of West Virginia. Jeff cut his teeth in the pulpit by doing appointment preaching for churches in the hills and hollers of the Ohio Valley. Following his freshman year at Marshall University, Jeff moved to Florence, Alabama in 1989 to attend the University of North Alabama, where he majored in Public Relations and Radio-Television-Film. Jeff graduated magna cum laude in 1992 and worked as a reporter with WOWL-TV in Florence that year. He gained invaluable experience by preaching for the Ligon Springs church of Christ near Russellville in 1991-1992. On December 19, 1992, Jeff married the former Michele Walker of Green Hill, Ala. and the couple moved to Austin, Texas, where Jeff began working with the Wonsley Drive church of Christ in July 1993. He left Austin for Fort Worth in November 2000. Jeff is also the program director and coach of a special needs softball/baseball team. Jeff currently resides in Burleson, Texas with his wife, Michele, and children, Reagan and Walker.